Dampak Insentif, Desentraliasi dan Sistim Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai

  • Gilbert Alvin Rumalatu Politeknik Negeri Ambon
  • Anthoneta Telsy Waelauruw Politeknik Negeri Ambon
Keywords: Intensive, Decentralization, Government Internal Control System, Performance

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to test and analyze intensive, decentralization effect and intern government control system to employee performance in Dinas Pariwisata, Pemuda dan Olah Raga Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Population from the research is from all employees In Dinas Pariwisata, Pemuda dan Olah Raga Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. It takes 46 respondent from the government employees and salaries employees. Data collection is done with a direct survey with census method as a sample gathering method. Hypothesis testing empirically using a Multiple Liniear Regression.

The research result shows that intensive is proven positive and significant effect employee performance. This mean if the intensive is raise or getting better have a good effect to employee performances. Decentralization is proven positive and significant to employee performance and this mean that authority delegation and the responsible are not did not go well on employee performance. Further intern control is proven positive and significant effect to employee performance. Which it’s mean if the government control system runs well then it will effect indirectly to employee performance goes better.

Keywords

;

Intensive, Decentralization, Government Internal Control System, Performance

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agripa Fernando Tarigan. (2011). Analisis Faktor - Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Pegawai Dalam Organisasi Sektor Publik (Studi pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Semarang Tengah Satu). Universitas Diponegoro.

Bernardin, H. J., & Russel A. E. J. (1988). Human Resources Management: An Experimental Approach (2nd ed.). New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill Inc.

Dessler, G. (2003). Human Resources Management (Nith Editi). Florida: International University.

Eduard Yohannis Tamaela, Victor Pattiasina, Margaretha B. Dasinapa, Yohanes Marani, J. A. D. (2020). Regional Financial Monitoring Models With Community Participation And Public Policy Transparency As Moderators. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(02), 4223–4232. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I2/PR200745

Ferdinand, A. (2006). Metode Penelitian Manajemen; Pedoman Penelitian Untuk Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis Dan Disertasi Ilmu Manajemen (2nd ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Indudewi, D., & Nafasati, F. (2012). Pengaruh Insentif, Desentralisasi, Ukuran Kinerja dan Kejelasan Sasaran terhadap Kinerja Organisasi (Studi Kasus pada Fakultas-Fakultas di Lingkungan Universitas Semarang). Jurnal Dinamika Sosbud, 14(1), 53–62.

Jusuf, R. S. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Tqm, Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Dan Reward Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 1(3), 634–644. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v1i3.1870

Karyanti, T. D. (2010). Pengaruh Kejelasan Sasaran, Desentralisasi, Dan Sistem Pengukuran Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi Sektor Publik (Studi Empiris Di Politeknik Negeri Semarang). Universitas Diponegoro.

Linda Oktarnia. (2013). Pengaruh Penetapan Sasaran dan Sistem Remunerasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Organisasi Sektor Publik (Studi pada Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara di JawaTimur). Pene. Retrieved from http://jurnal.umrah.ac.id/archives/3070

Luthans, F. (2002). Organizational Behavior (9th ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill Irwin.

Mangkuprawira, S., dan A. V. H. (2007). Manajemen Mutu Sumber Daya Manusia. Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.

Mazura, M. dan R. (2011). Pengaruh Insentif Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil (Studi Kasus Pada Badan Kepegawaian Daerah Kabupaten Bengkalis). Politeknik Negeri Bengkalis.

Miah, N. Z. dan L. M. (1996). Decentralization, Accounting Controls and Performance of Government Organizations: a New Zealand Empirical Study. Financial, Accountability and Management, 12(3), 173–190. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230263649_Decentralization_accounting_controls_and_performance_of_government_organizations_A_New_Zealand_empirical_study

Rusilawati, D. dan B. I. (2014). Pemberian Insentif Dalam Memacu Kinerja. E Journal Administrative Reform, 2(1), 1008–1019. Retrieved from http://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JParadigma/article/view/315

Sarita Permata Dewi. (2012). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Spbu Yogyakarta (Studi Kasus Pada Spbu Anak Cabang Perusahaan RB.Group). Jurnal Nominal, 1(1).

Sarwoto, B. (1997). Kasus-Kasus Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Badan Penerbitan IPWI.

Supriyanto. (2014). Pengaruh Beban Kerja, Pengalaman Audit, Tipe Kepribadian dan Skeptisme Profesional Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan (UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA; Vol. 2014). Retrieved from https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/39127%0Ahttps://cris.brighton.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/4755978/Julius+Ojebode%27s+Thesis.pdf%0Ausir.salford.ac.uk/29369/1/Angela_Darvill_thesis_esubmission.pdf%0Ahttps://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/ha

Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2014. Pertanggungjawaban atas Pelaksanaan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara Tahun Anggaran 2013. , (2014).

Victorio Fernando Nahuway & Eduard Yohannis Tamaela. (2020). Model Efektifitas dan Efisiensi E-Procurement serta Dampaknya Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna di Provinsi Maluku. JURNAL MANEKSI, 9(1), 275–282. Retrieved from http://ejournal-polnam.ac.id/index.php/JurnalManeksi/article/view/327/351

Published
2021-03-25
How to Cite
Rumalatu, G., & Waelauruw, A. (2021). Dampak Insentif, Desentraliasi dan Sistim Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. PUBLIC POLICY (Jurnal Aplikasi Kebijakan Publik & Bisnis), 2(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.30599/PublicPolicy.v2.i1.p21-36