Public Service Response at the Population Office

Keywords: Administrative Services, Service Response, Service Quality, Organizational Culture

Abstract

Slow and bad administrative services are a phenomenon that people commonly complain about. The responsiveness of public services has become a phenomenon. Public service institutions can provide fast, firm, and uncomplicated services as well as commit and respond to excellent public services. Responsive services are a service model expected to be established in all institutions in Indonesia at the Population and Civil Registry Office of Ambon City. Based on data analysis of NVIVO 12 Plus software analyzing 100 research articles about responsive public services that had been carried out in the previous year, it is found that there is still a lack of Scopus data publication documents published by Indonesian researchers in the theme of responsive public services. The research on the responsive aspect of services has not optimally discussed the aspects of service quality, information technology, organizational culture, work experience, work motivation, lack of facilities, cooperation, and work procedures. Therefore, this study aims at analyzing data from interviews regarding the responsive public services at the Population and Civil Registry Office of Ambon City focusing on these eight aspects using the NVIVO 12 Plus software.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, F., & Sadat, A. (2020). Model Pelayanan Publik Terhadap Reformasi Birokrasi. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.35326/jsip.v1i1.525

Agustina, E. (2019). Pelaksanaan Pelayanan Publik Berkualitas bagi Masyarakat. Jurnal Literasi Hukum, 274–282. https://jurnal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/literasihukum/article/view/1977/pdf

Baron, R. A. (2008). Social Psychology. Pearson Education India.

Bekkers, V. (2004). Virtual Policy Communities and Responsive Governance: Redesigning on-line Debates. Information Polity. https://content.iospress.com/articles/information-polity/ip000053

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (1998). Whistle-Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic. … of Public Administration Research and …. https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article-abstract/8/3/413/987732

Dwimawanti, I. H. (2004). (Salah Satu Parameter Keberhasilan Otonomi Daerah). Dialogue JIAKP, Vol.1(1), 109–116. http://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/3684/

Haryanto, A. T. (2007). Upaya Menciptakan Birokrasi yang Efisien, Inovatif, Responsif dan Akuntabel, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan. 7(2), 160–171. https://ejurnal.unisri.ac.id/index.php/Ekonomi/article/view/206/171

Haryati, E., & Ferriswara, D. (2020). Transformasi Pelayanan Publik pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Seminar Nasional Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4, 259–270. https://jurnal.saburai.id/index.php/PSN/article/view/831/647

Insani, P. A. (2017). Mewujudkan Kota Responsif Melalui Smart City. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 2(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v2i1.1423

Komatsu, T., Salgado, M., Deserti, A., & Rizzo, F. (2021). Policy Labs Challenges in the Public Sector: the Value of Design for More Responsive Organizations. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1917173

Kosanke, R. M. (2019). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik di Kecamatan Sungai Kunjang Kota Samarinda. 3(3), 1472–1486.

Kreitner, R. dan A. K. (2005). Perilaku Organisasi: Organizational Behavior. Salemba Empat.

Larasati, E. (2008). Reformasi Pelayanan Publik (Public Services Reform) dan Partisipasi Publik. Dialogue JIAKP, 5 (2)(2), 254–267. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11705795.pdf

Mahsyar, A. (2011). Masalah Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Administrasi Publik. Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v1i2.22

Man Keung Lo, J. (1993). Reflections on Responsive Public Administration in Hong Kong: The Citizen’s Charter, Performance Pledges and Beyond. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 15(2), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02598272.1993.10800279

Mustafa, D. (2016). Tanggung Jawab dan Responsivitas Birokrasi Pemerintahan dalam Pelayanan Publik di Kota Makassar (Studi Kasus Pelayanan Ijin Mendirikan Bangunan (IMB) di Dinas Tata Ruang dan Bangunan Kota Makassar). Jurnal Ilmiah ILMU Administrasi Publik, 5(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v5i2.1760

Oxman, R., & Carmon, N. (1986). Responsive Public Housing: An Alternative for Low-Income Families. Environment and Behavior, 18(2), 258–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916586182007

Paarlberg, L. E., & Lavigna, B. (2010). Transformational Leadership and Public Service Motivation: Driving Individual and Organizational Performance. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02199.x

Selanno, H., & Wance, M. (2021). Performance of Inspectorate in Supervision of Government Administration in Buru Selatan Regency. Sosiohumaniora, 23(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v23i2.30296

Usman, J. (2011). Manajemen Birokrasi Profesional dalam Meningkatkan Pelayanan Publik. Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v1i2.24

Wance, M. (2018). Efektivitas Pelayanan Transportasi Publik (Studi Pelayanan PT. Asdp Pelabuhan Bastiong Tahun 2017). Journal of Government, 3(2), 89–114. http://journal.uta45jakarta.ac.id/index.php/gov/article/view/1141

Widanti, N. P. T. (2022). Good Governance for Efficient Public Services Responsive and Transparent. Ijd-Demos, 4(2), 872–879. https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v4i2.286

Wisnu, L. (2019). Value Capturing for Regional Road Development: A Responsive Institutional Design Approach for Indonesia. research.rug.nl. https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/value-capturing-for-regional-road-development-a-responsive-instit

Published
2024-07-27
How to Cite
Wance, M., Aslinda, A., Niswaty, R., Nur, A., & Damasinta, A. (2024). Public Service Response at the Population Office. Public Policy ; Jurnal Aplikasi Kebijakan Publik Dan Bisnis, 5(2), 838-854. https://doi.org/10.51135/PublicPolicy.v5.i2.p838-854