Evaluasi Electronic Government Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Pelayanan Publik
Abstract
The implementation of online customer complaint handling at PDAM Surya Sembada Kota Surabaya is still not optimal and needs attention considering the importance of public services and PDAM is the only company engaged in the supply of clean water. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of e-government in PDAM Surya Sembada Kota Surabaya in terms of public services. The e-government management of PDAM Surya Sembada Kota Surabaya still has inaccuracies in handling online services, infrastructure indicators found that there is overlapping complaint data entering the system, and the application still does not have a customer service monitoring feature and the application is only available on Android. on Standard Operasional Prosedure (SOP) policy indicators it is necessary to carry out restandardization which is oriented towards e-government innovation. In terms of infrastructure indicators, it is necessary to evaluate the use of the company's internal system. In addition to application indicators, there is a need for innovation to add monitoring features for customers.
Downloads
References
Astuti, N. (2014). Penyediaan Air Bersih oleh Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM) Kota Sangatta Kabupaten Kutai Timur. 3 (2), 678–689.
Didi Susianto, Eka Ridhawati dan Sucipto, (2022) Implementasi E-Government Berbasis Android untuk Meningkatkan pelayanan Publik, Jurnal Al Azhar Indonesia Seri Sains dan Teknologi, Vol. 7, No. 3, September 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.36722/sst.v7i3.1143.
Fitriansyah, A., Budiarto, H., & Santoso, J. (2013). Metode Pemeringkatan E- Government Indonesia (PeGI) untuk Audit Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi. In Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi Indonesia, https://is.its.ac.id/pubs/oajis/index.php/home/event/SESINDO.
Heriyanto, (2022) Urgensi Penerapan E-Government dalam Pelayanan Publik, Musamus Journal of Public Adiministration, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2022, https://doi.org/10.35724/mjpa.v4i2.4128.
Instruksi Presiden Nomor 3 Tahun 2003, Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/147277/inpres-no-3-tahun-2003.
Khothimah, K., & Hertati, D. (2021). Evaluasi Kebijakan Program Bantuan Sosial Tunai. Jurnal Governansi, 99-110, https://ojs.unida.ac.id/JGS/article/view/4230.
Saadah, M. A. (2023). Responsivitas dan Transparansi Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta dalam Menangani Keluhan. PUBLIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 9(1), 99-114, https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/JIAP/article/view/12719.
Sekretariat Negara, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 Tentang Sistem Pemerintah Berbasis Elektronik, Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/147277/inpres-no-3-tahun-2003.
Setyarini, W. A. (2022). Survei Kepuasan Masyarakat Terhadap Pelayanan Pengaduan Masyarakat Lapor Hendi Tahun 2021. Jurnal Riptek, 16(2), 90-96, https://doi.org/10.35475/riptek.v16i2.157.
Syafirah, L., & Nawangsari, E. R. (2021). Efektivitas Pelayanan Pengaduan di Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM) Giri Tirta Kabupaten Gresik. Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(2), 928. doi: 10.36418/syntax- literate.v6i2.2170, https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i2.2170.
Copyright (c) 2023 Public Policy : Jurnal Aplikasi Kebijakan Publik dan Bisnis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors whose manuscripts are published in the Journal of Public Policy must agree to the following terms;
- Publication rights for all manuscript materials published are held by the editorial board with the author's consent.
- The legal formalities for digital access to the Journal of Public Policy are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike (CC BY SA) license, which means the Journal of Public Policy has the right to store, redistribute, reformat, manage in a database, maintain, and publish the manuscript without seeking permission from the author as long as the author's name is included as the copyright owner.
- Published manuscripts are open access for the purpose of disseminating research results. Besides this purpose, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright law violations.